Home       About us   Issues     Search     Submission Subscribe   Contact    Login 
Conservation and Society
An interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development
Conservation and Society
Users Online: 158 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size



 
Previous article Table of Contents  Next article
 

SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 184-189

Domesticating the Exotic? An Online Survey of Attitudes towards the International Wildlife Pet Trade


1 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Colorado, USA
2 Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, USA
3 Oklahoma Biological Survey; Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma; Department of Biology, Northwest Nazarene University, Idaho, USA
4 Oklahoma Biological Survey; Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, USA
5 Oklahoma Biological Survey; Department of Biology; Corix Plains Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, USA
6 Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, USA
7 Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability; Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, USA
8 Department of Anthropology and Center for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, USA

Correspondence Address:
Andrea Contina
Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Colorado
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_209_20

Rights and Permissions
Date of Submission09-Oct-2020
Date of Acceptance30-May-2021
Date of Web Publication04-Aug-2021
 

   Abstract 


There are a variety of perspectives on wildlife management and conservation, necessitating interdisciplinary research to develop better management strategies. We answered the call to action provided by Teel et al. (2018) to integrate social sciences into conservation and explored an important but understudied issue: views on the international pet-trade of exotic animals. Some pet owners advocate the pet trade as a means to promote conservation, where removing wild animals from their natural habitat could protect them from degraded environments. To gauge how prevalent this attitude is in a cross-national sample, we conducted an online survey that asked 882 participants worldwide to evaluate the pet trade and its relationship with biological conservation. Overall, our survey results showed regional patterns and indicated that younger respondents were more likely to consider international pet trade as a form of acceptable conservation practice compared to older respondents. Education also played a role in shaping views on the pet-trade and indicated that respondents with higher education degrees were less prone to accept pet trade as a substitute for conservation practices. Our research provides novel insights applicable to education programmes and international conservation efforts while highlighting variation in attitudes even among professionals with formal training in natural sciences and ecology.

Keywords: interdisciplinary research, conservation biology, social media, exotic pets.


How to cite this article:
Contina A, Anderson CE, Hille DC, Oakley WF, Bridge ES, Kelly JF, Smith HO, Koch J, Jervis LL. Domesticating the Exotic? An Online Survey of Attitudes towards the International Wildlife Pet Trade. Conservat Soc 2021;19:184-9

How to cite this URL:
Contina A, Anderson CE, Hille DC, Oakley WF, Bridge ES, Kelly JF, Smith HO, Koch J, Jervis LL. Domesticating the Exotic? An Online Survey of Attitudes towards the International Wildlife Pet Trade. Conservat Soc [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 15];19:184-9. Available from: https://www.conservationandsociety.org.in//text.asp?2021/19/3/184/323185




   Introduction Top


The international wildlife trade is an important topic in conservation biology, often examined through field observations, meta-analyses of long-term data and forensic investigations, and regulated by international laws and protection agreements (Chan et al. 2015). International treaties such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) document hundreds of thousands of live animals sold annually within an industry estimated to be worth billions of US dollars per year (Sollund 2013). Such agreements have been instrumental in gauging the size of wildlife exploitation trends and promoting conservation policies. The capture and commerce of live exotic animals for personal ownership, hereafter referred to as pet trade, makes up roughly one-fifth of wildlife trade activity (Baker et al. 2013). The pet trade is facilitated by a global movement network within and between continents and it can be detrimental to wildlife conservation, leading to population declines, extirpations, and extinctions (Andreone et al. 2005). For example, a recent threat analysis for Neotropical parrot populations concluded that the pet trade is one of the top reasons for population extirpations and declines (Berkunsky et al. 2017). One of the most enigmatic extirpations is that of Spix's Macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii), for which the demand as a pet only increased as it became rarer in the wild (Butchart et al. 2018).

Despite the large scale and impact of the international pet trade, the social component of this activity has received marginal attention and views about what constitutes good practice in wildlife conservation might vary widely across communities and at the global scale (Bennett 2016; Bennett et al. 2017). Moreover, although social-psychological studies informing human attitudes towards conservation have been conducted extensively (St John et al. 2011), there is little information on human perceptions regarding the international pet trade of exotic animals. There are numerous studies that examined attitudes towards wildlife conservation although limited research has been implemented to address the human perception of the exotic pet trade. For example, a study in Nepal found that human attitudes towards the conservation of the red panda (Ailurus fulgens) varied with geographic proximity of the survey respondents to protected areas (Sharma et al. 2019), while positive attitudes towards wildlife and protected areas in Ethiopia were found to be associated with higher education (Tessema et al. 2010).

Interestingly, examination of international social media posts from exotic pet owners and field investigations are beginning to reveal that some people may see ownership of exotic animals as a form of biological conservation (Martin et al. 2018; Harrington et al. 2019; Contina et al. 2019). Adherents to this perspective accept removing animals from their natural environments and transferring them into private residences to provide protection from deforestation, pollution, and the adverse consequences of climate change.

We conducted an online survey to examine attitudes regarding the interpretation of pet trade as a conservation approach. We identified patterns in attitudes related to the level of education, age, and country of origin. These findings, although not exhaustive, provide important insights for conservation management and emphasise that to enhance the effectiveness of conservation strategies it is crucial to consider the social dimension of the pet trade (Moorhouse et al. 2017).


   Methods Top


Survey deployment

We conducted an internet-based survey from December 2015 to December 2017 via a self-administered questionnaire created using the kwiksurveys.com platform. We disseminated the online survey in Europe, Oceania, Africa, Asia, North, Central, and South America via social media. We posted the survey link on some of the author's personal Twitter and Facebook accounts which was then shared by hundreds of connections, as well as Quick Response codes (QR™) on printed flyers posted at the University of Oklahoma, University of California Los Angeles, University of Michigan, all of which are university campuses in the United States. We also recruited participants by posting our survey link on ECOLOG-L, an online mailing list associated with the Ecological Society of America and hosted at the University of Maryland (https://listserv.umd.edu/archives/ecolog-l.html). This mailing list dedicated to ecology and natural science topics has more than 19,000 subscribers worldwide (Inouye pers. comm.).

Survey questions

The survey included two questions; the first question focused on international trade of exotic species: 'Is the regulated international trade of wildlife an acceptable practice that can help with the conservation effort of certain species when it removes animals from a polluted, over-exploited, or degraded environment, and offers them a safe shelter in a house setting?'. The second question was: 'If the wild animals are given adequate care, there is nothing wrong in keeping them inside homes as pets. Do you agree with this statement?'. For both questions participants could choose from one of the following responses: 1) 'Yes'; 2) 'Yes, but it depends on the species'; 3) 'No'. The survey was offered in Spanish and English. Even though the survey was made available to a global audience, we focused on collecting data primarily in the United States and Canada. Spanish translations are available in the survey questionnaire (http://kwiksurveys.com/s/9teF46y8).

We designed our survey questions to require respondents to consider the underlying trade-offs between environmental or species contexts. Our questions included positively valenced outcome scenarios by affirming that wild animals would be provided with a 'safe shelter' once removed from a degraded environment as stated in question one, and by adding a positive conditional statement worded as 'if the wild animals are given adequate care' included in question two. Therefore, we asked participants to make considerations given a limiting set of conditions similar to prompted responses about behavior presented in other social science research involving scenario planning, message threats, or willingness to pay (Peterson et al. 2003; Martín-López et al. 2007; Miller et al. 2013). Wildlife imperiling scenarios are frequently reported by the news networks, social media, and echoed by global wildlife campaigns promoted by conservation associations or national governments. Hence, through the inclusion of elements that referred to 'polluted', 'over-exploited', and 'degraded environments', we aimed to create a set of constraints for thinking about wildlife protection as they might be experienced by the respondents in their daily lives (Peterson et al. 2003). We attempted to capture how people across countries, including ecologists, react and interpret conservation measures when challenged by the need (e.g., sense of urgency) of immediate wildlife protection actions.

Statistical analysis

We explored associations between survey respondents' age, education level, and geographic origin and their predisposition towards the 'wildlife trade as an acceptable conservation approach' through a Chi-squared test in the R package stats (R Core Team 2020). We considered the response towards pet trade as a form of conservation approach and investigated its three levels according to the following attitudes: a) 'Yes' - in favor of wildlife trade as a form of conservation, b) 'Depends' - in favor of wildlife trade as a form of conservation but only for particular species, and c) 'No' - against wildlife trade as an acceptable form of conservation. For details on how we collected data on age, education level, and country of origin of the respondents please see the survey questionnaire.


   Results Top


Survey findings

A total of 882 participants completed the survey. Most participants originated from North America (N = 696) and Europe (N = 90) although additional responses came from other regions of the world including South and Central America and Asia (N = 46, N = 16, and N = 17, respectively). A complete list of responses is presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary of questionnaire responses. Data collected across age groups, education level, and self-identified country of origin of survey respondents

Click here to view


Removing wildlife from their natural environment to be raised as pets was seen as acceptable conservation practice for 564 respondents (63.9%), with 419 respondents (47.5% of the total dataset) stating that this approach would be acceptable only on a case-by-case scenario in relation to the particular species being considered [Table 1]. We found an association between participants' age and attitude towards the international pet trade of exotic animals (χ2 = 22.7, df = 8, p = 0.004), with younger respondents more likely to consider the pet trade an acceptable conservation practice than older respondents. Similarly, we found an association between education level of the survey respondents and attitudes toward the international pet trade (χ2 = 30.8, df = 16, p = 0.01). Respondents with high school diplomas and bachelor's degrees appeared more inclined to consider it as an acceptable practice of wildlife protection, while those with postgraduate degrees were less prone to accept wildlife trade. We did not find associations between age and education and respondents' predispositions toward accepting a direct statement on keeping exotic animals as house pets (χ2 = 10.8, df = 8, p = 0.20 and χ2 = 13.9, df = 16, p = 0.60; respectively). We found no associations between the geographic origin of survey participants and attitudes toward wildlife trade and exotic pets held in captivity (χ2 = 16.6, df = 14, p = 0.27 and χ2 = 19.2, df = 14, p = 0.15; respectively).


   Discussion Top


Attitudes toward the pet trade

Overall, our findings suggest that attitudes towards the pet trade intended as a form of conservation can be predicted by age and education in agreement with previous studies (Tikka et al. 2000; Sorce et al. 2005). While demographic factors are important in how individuals view wildlife interactions (Hosey and Melfi 2014; Teel and Manfredo 2010), it is likely that survey respondents from specific professional fields (e.g., ecology or related disciplines) might represent the majority of post-graduate people and older people. In other words, the field of study may be driving the survey results, not age or educational level.

While our survey was not comprehensive, it nonetheless brings attention to a controversial aspect of wildlife management: the role of the pet trade in a fast-changing world threatened by anthropogenic change (pollution, habitat degradation, etc.). We found that 29.6% of participants thought it acceptable to keep wild animals as pets if given adequate care, suggesting that pet trade as conservation practice is considered more tolerable when provided in the context of degraded environmental conditions. Our survey also indicates that when individuals are faced with the decision of addressing the environment or addressing single species outcomes, they lean towards the species (Schlegel and Rupf 2010). The percentages of acceptability, even when including species-dependent context, across the two survey questions (e.g., 63.9% and 29.6%, respectively) suggests that respondents were less concerned with species removal from the natural habitat when provided additional constraints of environmental stress. These results are compatible with studies documenting the wide and increasing spread of exotic pet ownership (Lavorgna 2015; Alves et al. 2019).

Online survey approach: benefits and limitations

Our findings also need to be evaluated in relation to questionnaire dissemination and survey design. As most participants were recruited via social media and natural science-focused email list servers (e.g., ECOLOG-L), it is likely that subscribers were knowledgeable about or interested in wildlife conservation. Therefore, our results suggest that variation in attitudes toward wildlife conservation might be broader than expected, even among professionals in the field of ecology and among people holding advanced degrees.

Moreover, survey responses gathered via email, social media, or through internet services selling low-cost questionnaires (e.g., Amazon Mechanical Turk) can gather large quantities of data and offer a relatively quick and inexpensive snapshot of attitudes worldwide (Casler et al. 2013). Thus, even though researchers should carefully consider the tradeoff between the financial costs and the benefits of collecting repeated measures representative of a specific population of interest (Babbie 2020), online surveys can still provide useful information with the caveat that they may require additional steps to ensure quality of the data. For example, it might be necessary to the identify the IP addresses of the participants to eliminate duplicate responses, or to record the initial and final timestamp of the questionnaire to filter out answers submitted too quickly to be meaningful (Eysenbach 2004). We also recognise that the online snowball sampling technique might lead to potential skew in analysis although the exact nature of that is difficult to assess because of the anonymity of the collection (Couper and Miller 2008). Nevertheless, the novel approach and results of the present study encourage further and more thorough investigation while offering an insight on some of the ways in which modern online surveys may help to understand human attitudes characteristic of the Anthropocene.

Relation to modern conservation biology

A possible explanation for attitudes being skewed toward favorable responses to international pet trade activities might involve the conservation efforts promoted by the zoological gardens of the 21st century. Modern zoos are connected with university-level research projects, have developed extensive outreach programmes, and are invested in tangible conservation action plans (Patrick et al. 2007). Indeed, zoos are also popular citizen and tourist attractions, with an estimated number of worldwide visitors to be over 600 million per year (Skibins and Powell 2013). Even though accredited zoos generally discourage engaging in exotic pet trade, unguided zoo visits may result in erroneous understanding of animal biology and their natural habitats (Jensen 2014). It may be that our survey detected at least a partial and unintended effect that zoos and aquariums across the world have on human attitudes regarding wildlife in captivity.

The age factor and the younger generations

Our results suggest that the age of the respondents can be a predictor of propensity to accept the pet trade in relation to conservation efforts. Several studies have found age to be correlated with attitudes towards biodiversity and conservation (Young 2005; Lückmann et al. 2013). While additional investigation is needed to understand the exact motivating factors of this finding, we suggest potential factors contributing to the age pattern detected by the survey. The first is that individuals from the 'Millennial generation' (i.e., people born after 1980) might be more open to accept controversial practices, such as removing wildlife from their natural environments to ensure survival in captivity, as they perceive an incumbent and irreversible biodiversity loss which they have been exposed to since an early age (Perera and Hewege 2013). Social science literature has captured how early exposure of environmental education media presented at young age can help develop self-identities related to environmental protection that last throughout a lifetime (McGuire 2015). Alternatively, young people may not be fully aware of the threats that international pet trade poses on endangered species and wildlife conservation. This may be a consequence of not experiencing nature directly but rather through remote alternatives such as nature and wilderness videos shared on social media (Barton 2012). Moreover, for younger individuals there may be a certain social status or cachet associated with rare pet ownership akin to the exotic pet trade of the 15th and 16th centuries (Grigson 2016). In some instances, the two factors may combine to result in the view that wildlife conservation can be carried out in domestic environments. Individuals may consider it important to take any action to help save charismatic wildlife species rather than dwelling on the wider ethical or ecological consequences. The exact mechanism is beyond the scope of the data presented but provides an interesting starting point for future research.


   Conclusion Top


Our research shows variation in attitudes across age and education of the survey respondents, particularly in the U.S. and Canada. It reveals that people's attitudes might change when exposed to different wildlife threatening scenarios. Future studies will need to recognise that high variation in attitudes towards the international pet trade might exist even within professionals with formal training in the natural sciences and ecology.


   Acknowledgements Top


We thank David Inouye for allowing dissemination of the survey on ECOLOG-L. We thank Justin Reedy, Claudia Andres, four anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the draft. The online survey was approved by The University of Oklahoma Institutional Review Board (IRB: 6046). This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) National Research Traineeship (NRT) program (NSF-NRT: 1545261).



 
   References Top

1.
Alves, R. R. N., B.M.C. de Araújo, I. da Silva Policarpo, et al. 2019. Keeping reptiles as pets in Brazil: ethnozoological and conservation aspects. Journal for nature conservation 49: 9–21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Andreone, F., J.E. Cadle, N. Cox, et al. 2005. Species review of amphibian extinction risks in Madagascar: conclusions from the global amphibian assessment. Conservation Biology 19(6): 1790–1802.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Babbie, E. 2020. The Practice of Social Research. fifteenth edition. Boston: Cengage Learning.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Baker, S.E., R. Cain, and D.W. Macdonald. 2013. Rough trade: animal welfare in the global wildlife trade. BioScience 63(12): 928–938.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Barton, K. 2012. Colorado's millennial generation: youth perceptions and experiences of nature. Journal of Geography 111(6): 213–223.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bennett N. 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 30(3): 582–592.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bennett, N., R. Roth, S. Klain, et al. 2017. Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation 205: 93–108.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Berkunsky, I., P. Quillfeldt, D.J. Brightsmith, et al. 2017. Current threats faced by neotropical parrot populations. Biological Conservation 214: 278–287.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Butchart, S., S. Lowe, R. Martin, et al. 2018. Which bird species have gone extinct? a novel quantitative classification approach. Biological Conservation 227: 9–18.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Casler, K., L. Bickel, and E. Hackett. 2013. Separate but equal? a comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in human behavior 29(6): 2156–2160.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Chan, H.K., H. Zhang, F. Yang, et al. 2015. Improve customs systems to monitor global wildlife trade. Science 348(6232): 291–292.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Contina, A., J.L. Alcantara, E.S. Bridge, et al. 2019. Genetic structure of the Painted Bunting and its implications for conservation of migratory populations. Ibis 161(2): 372–386.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Couper, M. and P. Miller. 2008. Web survey methods: introduction. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5): 831–835.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Eysenbach, G. 2004. Improving the quality of web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of medical Internet research 6(3): e34.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Grigson, C. 2016. Menagerie: the history of exotic animals in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Jensen, E. 2014. Evaluating children's conservation biology learning at the zoo. Conservation Biology 28(4): 1004–1011.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Harrington, L.A., D.W. Macdonald, and N. D'Cruze. 2019. Popularity of pet otters on YouTube: evidence of an emerging trade threat. Nature Conservation 36: 17–45.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hosey, G. and V. Melfi. 2014. Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: a review and analysis of the literature. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 27(1): 117–142.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lavorgna, A. 2015. The social organization of pet trafficking in cyberspace. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 21(3): 353–370.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lückmann, K., V. Lagemann, and S. Menzel. 2013. Landscape assessment and evaluation of young people: comparing nature-orientated habitat and engineered habitat preferences. Environment and Behavior 45(1): 86–112.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Martin, R., C. Senni, and N. D'Cruze. 2018. Trade in wild-sourced African grey parrots: insights via social media. Global Ecology and Conservation 15: 00429.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Martín-López, B., C. Montes, and J. Benayas. 2007. The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 139(1–2): 67–82.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
McGuire, N. 2015. Environmental education and behavioral change: an identity-based environmental education model. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10(5): 695–715.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Miller, C., B. Adame, and S. Moore. 2013. Vested interest theory and disaster preparedness. Disasters 37(1): 1–27.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Moorhouse, T., M. Balaskas, N. D'Cruze, et al. 2017. Information could reduce consumer demand for exotic pets. Conservation Letters 10(3): 337–345.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Patrick, P., C. Matthews, D. Ayers, et al. 2007. Conservation and education: prominent themes in zoo mission statements. Journal of Environmental Education 38(3): 53–59.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Perera, L. and C. Hewege. 2013. Climate change risk perceptions and environmentally conscious behaviour among young environmentalists in Australia. Young Consumers 14(2): 139–154.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Peterson, G., G. Cumming, and S. Carpenter. 2003. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17(2): 358–366.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Schlegel, J. and R. Rupf. 2010. Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in nature conservation: a survey among students of different educational institutions. Journal for Nature Conservation 18(4): 278–290.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Sharma, H., J. Belant, and P. Shaner. 2019. Attitudes towards conservation of the endangered red panda Ailurus fulgens in Nepal: a case study in protected and non-protected areas. Oryx 53(3): 542–547.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Skibins, J. and R. Powell. 2013. Conservation caring: measuring the influence of zoo visitors' connection to wildlife on pro-conservation behaviors. Zoo Biology 32(5): 528–540.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sollund, R. 2013. Animal trafficking and trade: abuse and species injustice. In: Emerging issues in green criminology. critical criminological perspectives. (eds. Walters, R., D.S. Westerhuis, and T. Wyatt). London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Sorce, P., V. Perotti, and S. Widrick. 2005. Attitude and age differences in online buying. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 33: 122–132.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
St John, F., G. Edwards-Jones, and J. Jones. 2011. Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research 37(8): 658–667.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Teel, T. and M. Manfredo. 2010. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 24(1): 128–139.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Teel, T., C. Anderson, M. Burgman, et al. 2018. Publishing social science research in conservation biology to move beyond biology. Conservation Biology 32: 6–8.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Tessema, M., R. Lilieholm, Z. Ashenafi, et al. 2010. Community attitudes toward wildlife and protected areas in Ethiopia. Society and Natural Resources 23(6): 489–506.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Tikka, P., M. Kuitunen, and S. Tynys. 2000. Effects of educational background on students' attitudes, activity levels, and knowledge concerning the environment. The Journal of Environmental Education 31(3): 12–19.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Young, S. 2005. Biodiversity, participation and community: reintegrating people and nature. Environmental Politics 14(5): 697–702.  Back to cited text no. 40
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
Previous articleNext article
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
    Abstract
     Introduction
     Methods
     Results
     Discussion
     Conclusion
     Acknowledgements
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed514    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded55    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal